Globally_Naturalized

As I said, deviant simply means that the subject matter differs from the... more »

As I said, deviant simply means that the subject matter differs from the norm - or, as you put it, "diverging from normal standards". One can not argue that a way of life is wrong based solely on the fact that it is held by a minority. I don't see why you continue to attempt to use a point that holds no water.

Ah, I see what you were trying to do now. You were using the word "natural"... more »

Ah, I see what you were trying to do now. You were using the word "natural" in place of the word "acceptable" when the two are very different. The former only places actions on an instinctual level while the latter implies some moral backgroud. Again, I will ask you to give some argument here on how homosexuality is morally wrong.

Your use of the word deviant is also too ambiguous to be used in any... more »

Your use of the word deviant is also too ambiguous to be used in any substantial argument. Deviant simply means that the subject matter differs from the norm. Not only is it too broad a term, an argument based on condemning an act simply because is not a part of the current mainstream culture is ludicrous. Also, using the argument that a behavior is "natural" or "unnatural" is also fallacious. Homosexuality is found outside of our species in nature - as is canabalism. Just becuase something is found in nature does not make it morally right or wrong. So please, please stop using these types of arguments - you're not saying anything by using them and they only make you look like a fool.

Do you understand now YesOn8? I thought you might have grasped the... more »

Do you understand now YesOn8? I thought you might have grasped the differance between homosexuality and the other "deviant" forms of sexuality weeks ago after I had argued exactly in the same manner as Sassafrass, challanged you to find a counter arguement, and never heard the subject brought up again. Just because new people have joined the discussion does not give you leave to state as fact what has previously been proven false. You may, sir, pick up your argument where we left it some few weeks ago. As a reminder, I will re-post the conclusion you so often use and challange you yet again to find a premise for it.

"Sexual acts are only permissable when those acts are between one living, phycologically mature female and one living, phycologically mature male of the same species who are not directly related - directly related meaning that the two individuals meantioned do not share a grandparent."

Until the resistance to gay marriage begins arguing intelligently, they... more »

Until the resistance to gay marriage begins arguing intelligently, they will continue to only further support the argument that such opponents are nothing more than bigots. You, sir, are doing yourself a disservice.