When American government passed the UIGEA in 2006, opinions of people split up. The same situation was with the states. At one state the government was not satisfied with the introduced bill and thus didn’t hurry to implement it into life, while in the other state the government took the opposite position. Let’s take Kentucky as an example. As a matter of fact, Kentucky was the first state which started acting against online casinos.
2008 Kentucky Governor take a serious step and seized 141 domain names
at the state. It was a shocking event for everyone, as among these
domains were rather famous online casinos. There were names under iMEGA
and IGC, including Microgaming ones. By the way, since that time
Microgaming had to stop its operating at the territory of the country
due to the situation with legality of its work. Thousands of players
lost an opportunity to play their famous online casino games.
now there are no decisions made on domain names seizure suit. It seems
that everything goes back to its starting point. But now one more suit
is added. It concerns the payments, and it is said that those online
casino operators who were working illegally at Kentucky state , have to
pay revenues. Among them there are Full Tilt Poker, Party Gaming and
Microgaming. Now the suit is passed to the court and trial begins. Such
situation arose according to the statute of the state which had never
been used before.
does Kentucky behave like that? This is a question, which bothers many
people today. If you want to get some explanation, you are welcome to do
it. We have tried to throw light upon the situation specially for you.
You may find the article by following the link
Hall of Fame